Talk: Flamethrower

Main image[]

Not sure which one works better for the article. Obviously, we can delete the ones we don't use afterwards.

Any thoughts? Thief12 06:20, January 27, 2012 (UTC)

Hm, I think I might prefer the lower one, although the other shots are cooler, it does illustrate the actual "flamethrower" best. But whatever you think - any of them look good to me.

On another note, this article always bothered me in that it's not really eligible under our current inclusion policy as I don't believe "handheld flamethrower" was a term ever used in the canon. It's come from the research files, which are oou, and really we only are meant to take "character names" from oou stuff. But, it's a good article so it's not a big deal and I'm not suggesting a deletion.--Acer4666 (talk) 12:26, January 28, 2012 (UTC)

That's what I liked about that one, whereas in the others, you can see the actual "flame". Anyway, let's see what everyone else says. About the article per se, I just checked. The article was an anon creation back in the day. Thief12 13:11, January 28, 2012 (UTC)